
LGC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — LGC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
LGC presents a moderate risk profile with a Beneish M-Score of -2.5086, indicating no immediate signs of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant weaknesses, particularly in revenue and margin quality, which could pose risks in financial reporting.
- Earnings Quality Score of 65.9/100 indicates potential issues, particularly with eq_margin at 19.2/100 and eq_revenue at 13.4/100, suggesting low profitability and revenue recognition concerns.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.5086 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated with institutional investors holding 93.7% of shares, which may reduce the risk of management misalignment but could also lead to governance issues if interests diverge.
Investors should closely monitor earnings quality metrics, particularly revenue recognition and margins, while considering the strong institutional backing as a stabilizing factor. A cautious approach is advised until improvements in earnings quality are observed.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for LGC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate