SRA
ConsumerValuation Breakdown
A classic Discounted Cash Flow model built on Free Cash Flow (FCF), the actual cash a business generates after all operating expenses and capital expenditures. Future FCF is projected for 10 years with gradually decaying growth, then discounted back to today's value using WACC. This is the gold standard of intrinsic valuation: it values the company based on what it can actually deliver to shareholders, independent of market sentiment.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SRA
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
SRA exhibits several concerning indicators that suggest potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by its Beneish M-Score of -3.0945, which is significantly below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. While the company has a strong cash conversion rate, its low earnings quality score of 48.3/100, particularly in revenue and margin metrics, raises additional concerns.
- Beneish M-Score of -3.0945 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 48.3/100, with eq_revenue at 0.0/100, suggests poor revenue recognition practices.
- Strong cash conversion rate of 100.0/100 indicates effective cash management.
- Low SGI of 3.5796 suggests that the company is not overexpanding relative to its revenue growth.
The ownership structure is fragmented with no single shareholder holding a controlling stake, which may dilute accountability. However, the presence of institutional ownership (7.8% by Kingphar) can provide some level of oversight.
Investors should approach SRA with caution due to the elevated risk of earnings manipulation. A thorough review of financial statements and management practices is recommended before considering any investment.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SRA — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate