
VE2
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VE2
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2020
The Beneish M-Score of 0.7366 indicates a significant likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well above the threshold of -1.78. Additionally, the low Earnings Quality Score of 20.0/100, particularly the zero scores in accruals, cash conversion, and margins, raises serious concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of 0.7366 indicates potential earnings manipulation, significantly above the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 20.0/100, with zero scores in eq_accrual, eq_cash_conv, and eq_margin, suggests poor earnings quality and potential financial misrepresentation.
- High receivables score of 100.0/100 indicates strong collection practices, which could be a positive aspect of the financial health.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated among a few individuals, with the top five shareholders holding over 70% of the company. This concentration could lead to governance issues and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should approach VE2 with caution, considering the high risk of earnings manipulation and poor earnings quality. It is advisable to conduct further due diligence and monitor any changes in financial reporting practices.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VE2 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate