
VOS
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VOS
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The forensic assessment of VOS indicates significant risks related to earnings manipulation and poor earnings quality. With a Beneish M-Score of -1.2986, the company is close to the threshold indicating potential manipulation, compounded by an Earnings Quality Score of only 19.5/100, highlighting severe issues in cash conversion and revenue recognition.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.2986 is above the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting potential earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 19.5/100 indicates very low earnings quality, particularly with eq_cash_conv and eq_revenue both at 0.0/100.
- The company has a relatively low SGI of 0.5566, indicating that sales growth is not overly aggressive compared to previous periods, which could suggest more stable operations.
The top shareholder, Tổng Công ty Hàng hải Việt Nam, holds a dominant 51.0% stake, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest and reduced oversight from minority shareholders.
Investors should exercise caution and consider divesting or avoiding VOS until there are clear improvements in earnings quality and transparency in financial reporting.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VOS — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate