
STG
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — STG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.2191 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 57.2 suggests moderate concerns regarding the sustainability of earnings, particularly with a concerning revenue quality score of 0.0.
- Earnings quality score of 57.2 indicates potential issues with earnings sustainability.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0 suggests that revenue recognition may not be reliable.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.2191 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- High accrual quality score of 88.5 suggests strong earnings management practices.
The concentrated ownership structure, with 69.3% held by ITL Group, may pose risks related to governance and decision-making, potentially limiting minority shareholder influence.
Investors should closely monitor earnings quality metrics and consider engaging with management for clarity on revenue recognition practices, while remaining cautious due to the concentrated ownership structure.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for STG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate