VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Construction sector

KDM

Construction
Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn GCL
Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
27.900
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Very Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
2.561
Current
27.900
Gap
-90.8%
ModelEV EBITDA DCF BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTXây dựng và Vật liệuConstruction
Classified as construction because ICB sector "Xây dựng và Vật liệu" maps to the construction group
ModelEV/EBITDA + DCF Blend
Intrinsic = 50% x EV/EBITDA Value + 50% x DCF Value

Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.100
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
12.20%
Ke
12.20%
x
E/(D+E)
98.79%
+
Kd(1-t)
6.41%
x
D/(D+E)
1.21%
=
WACC
12.13%
2
Growth Estimate
Sector Default3.00%
Growth decays 12%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
4
Valuation
50%EV/EBITDA Value
2.289
50%DCF Value
2.832
Blended Intrinsic
2.561
Value Decomposition
43%
57%
Explicit period (43%)Terminal value (57%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — KDM

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

18
Poor
Accrual Quality
48
Cash Conversion
0
Receivables
0
Margin Stability
38
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2017

-1.10
High Risk
DSRI
0.615
GMI
2.863
AQI
3.934
SGI
0.536
DEPI
0.668
SGAI
0.082
TATA
-0.063
LVGI
0.538

KDM exhibits a moderate risk profile with potential earnings manipulation suggested by its Beneish M-Score of -1.1045, which is above the manipulation threshold. However, the company shows strong cash conversion metrics, indicating some level of operational efficiency despite concerns over revenue recognition.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.1045 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78.
  • Earnings Quality Score of 43.7/100 is relatively low, particularly with 0.0/100 in receivables, margin, and revenue metrics, suggesting significant concerns in revenue recognition.
Positive Signals
  • Strong cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates effective cash flow management.
  • Low SGI of 0.5360 suggests that sales growth is not overly aggressive compared to previous periods.
Ownership Risk

The ownership structure is fragmented with no single entity holding a controlling stake, which may reduce the risk of concentrated decision-making. However, the presence of multiple individual shareholders could lead to potential conflicts of interest.

Recommendation

Investors should closely monitor KDM's revenue recognition practices and consider conducting a deeper analysis into its financial reporting. Given the moderate risk, a cautious approach is recommended, possibly waiting for improved earnings quality metrics before making significant investments.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
2/9
Weak
Z-Score
198.71
Safe Zone
Sharpe
0.86
Positive
Composite
32
Weak
Price Risk
Momentum
+43.5%
Volatility
66.5%
Max Drawdown
-36.8%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
331.42P/E
P/B2.92
P/S15.44
ROE0.9%
ROA0.9%
EPS90.52
BVPS10265.21
Gross Margin2.1%
Net Margin4.7%
D/E0.01
Current Ratio112.39
Rev Growth-58.6%
Profit Growth-47.0%
EV/EBITDA-311.26
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
7.6M
Charter Capital
76.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Xây dựng
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for KDM — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
nguyen-dinh-hung
Indiv
10.1%
717.700
Công ty Cổ phần Đầu Tư Nmvt
Inst
9.7%
1.4 trieu
nguyen-thi-van
Indiv
6.7%
510.624
nguyen-thi-mai
Indiv
6.3%
479.800
Lê Thị Bích Lan
Indiv
4.8%
340.900
Đỗ Yến Vy
Indiv
4.7%
336.400
Trần Thị Mến
Indiv
4.7%
330.500
Trịnh Thị Chung
Indiv
4.2%
300.000
Lê Thị Hạnh Nguyên
Indiv
3.5%
250.000
Trịnh Bá Toàn
Indiv
3.2%
229.700
Công ty Cổ phần Trường Tiền Holdings
Inst
3.2%
230.000
Mai Lệ Huyền
Indiv
3.2%
229.100
Nguyễn Văn Hưng
Indiv
3.2%
225.000
Nguyễn Văn Hiệp
Indiv
3.2%
225.000
Trần Ngọc Huy
Indiv
2.8%
201.000
Lại Xuân Hưởng
Indiv
2.8%
199.900
Hoàng Xuân Hòa
Indiv
2.7%
185.500
Lã Văn Châm
Indiv
2.6%
180.000
Lã Văn Quyến
Indiv
2.6%
180.000
Hoàng Lê Hoàng
Indiv
2.5%
176.000
Chu Văn Dũng
Indiv
1.7%
127.009
nguyen-cong-hoan
Indiv
1.4%
100.000
Tạ Quốc Toàn
Indiv
0.7%
50.000
Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hương
Indiv
0.7%
50.000
Lại Mai Hương
Indiv
0.7%
50.000
Vũ Minh Thu
Indiv
0.7%
50.000
Board & Management
Lê Thị Hạnh Nguyên3.5%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Quang Huy
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Thanh Cường
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Thị Kiều Anh
Kế toán trưởng
Bùi Thị Hiền Hậu
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị độc lập/Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Đỗ Thị Hà
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Tổng Giám đốc
Trần Thị Ngân Hà
Kế toán trưởng
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →