
MHC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — MHC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2023
MHC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.3292, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation, yet the high SGI of 2.5927 raises concerns about aggressive revenue growth. The earnings quality score of 57.6 suggests mixed performance, with strong receivables but poor revenue margin metrics.
- SGI of 2.5927 indicates aggressive growth that may not be sustainable.
- Earnings quality margin score of 0.0/100 suggests significant issues with profitability.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.3292 is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- High receivables quality score of 100.0/100 suggests effective management of receivables.
The top shareholders are primarily institutional, which can provide stability; however, the concentration of ownership among a few institutions (over 54% combined) may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor revenue growth trends and earnings quality metrics, particularly the low margin score, while considering a cautious approach due to the elevated risk level.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for MHC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate