
SWC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SWC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
SWC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.492, well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant weaknesses, particularly in revenue recognition and receivables management, which could pose risks to financial integrity.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.492 indicates a low likelihood of manipulation, but the earnings quality score of 63.3/100 is concerning, especially with an eq_revenue score of 0.0/100, suggesting potential issues in revenue recognition.
- The eq_accrual score of 93.5/100 indicates strong accrual quality, suggesting that reported earnings are likely backed by actual cash flows.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with 84.4% held by Công ty TNHH MTV Đầu Tư Hạ Tầng Sotrans, which may lead to governance risks and reduced shareholder influence on management decisions.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow statements and revenue recognition practices, and consider diversifying their portfolio to mitigate risks associated with concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SWC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate