VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Cyclicals sector

TNA

Cyclicals
Công ty Cổ phần Thương mại Xuất nhập khẩu Thiên Nam
Tài nguyên Cơ bản/Kim loạiCT
3.700
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
15.509
Current
3.700
Gap
+319.2%
ModelEV EBITDA MIDCYCLE

Valuation Breakdown

CTTài nguyên Cơ bảnCyclical
Classified as cyclical because ICB sector "Tài nguyên Cơ bản" maps to the cyclical group
ModelEV/EBITDA Mid-Cycle
Equity Value = Mid-Cycle EBITDA x Fair EV/EBITDA - Net Debt

Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.

1
Model Inputs
Mid-Cycle EBITDA102.95B
Fair EV/EBITDA12.1x
Years of data7
2
Valuation
Mid-Cycle EBITDA
102.95B
x
Fair EV/EBITDA
12.1x
-
Net Debt
474.55B
=
Equity Value
15.509
Years of data7

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — TNA

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

40
Weak
Accrual Quality
85
Cash Conversion
23
Receivables
0
Margin Stability
0
Revenue Quality
76

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

-0.37
High Risk
DSRI
4.943
GMI
0.216
AQI
0.848
SGI
0.263
DEPI
1.177
SGAI
2.221
TATA
-0.038
LVGI
1.054

TNA exhibits several red flags indicating potential earnings manipulation, particularly with a Beneish M-Score of -0.3692, well above the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The earnings quality score of 39.9/100, coupled with high DSRI and SGAI ratios, suggests significant concerns regarding revenue recognition and expense management.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -0.3692 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78.
  • DSRI of 4.9431 suggests significant increases in receivables relative to sales, indicating potential revenue recognition issues.
  • SGAI of 2.2212 indicates that sales growth is not supported by corresponding growth in expenses, raising concerns about operational efficiency.
Positive Signals
  • The GMI of 0.2158 indicates a relatively low gross margin deterioration, which can be a positive sign in terms of cost management.
  • The eq_accrual score of 84.9/100 suggests that the company has a relatively strong ability to convert earnings into cash, despite other weaknesses.
Ownership Risk

The ownership structure is highly concentrated with the top five shareholders holding 62.5% of the shares, which could lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.

Recommendation

Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence on TNA, particularly regarding revenue recognition practices. Consider monitoring future earnings reports closely for signs of improvement in earnings quality metrics.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
5/9
Neutral
Z-Score
0.10
Distress Zone
Sharpe
-2.18
Negative
Composite
41
Weak
Price Risk
Momentum
-36.4%
Volatility
30.0%
Max Drawdown
-44.9%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
-2.86P/E
P/B0.41
P/S0.56
ROE-13.5%
ROA-3.0%
EPS-1293.38
BVPS8999.07
Gross Margin12.4%
Net Margin-19.6%
D/E4.00
Current Ratio1.04
Rev Growth-73.7%
Profit Growth-4.8%
EV/EBITDA35.33
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
49.6M
Charter Capital
495.8B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Tài nguyên Cơ bản
Industry (ICB L3)
Kim loại
Sub-industry
Thép và sản phẩm thép
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for TNA — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
nguyen-quang-hoa
Indiv
17.3%
8.6 trieu
Nguyễn Trần Thảo Nguyên
Indiv
15.9%
7.9 trieu
Nguyễn Trần Thảo Hương
Indiv
8.0%
4.0 trieu
Trần Thị Hiền
Indiv
6.3%
3.1 trieu
Lê Thị Hoài Thương
Indiv
5.0%
1.7 trieu
Lê Đức Hiếu
Indiv
4.8%
1.6 trieu
Phạm Thị Phương Vũ
Indiv
4.7%
2.3 trieu
PYN Elite Fund
Inst
4.6%
1.6 trieu
Nguyễn Thị Hiền
Indiv
4.5%
1.5 trieu
Hồ Nam Huy
Indiv
4.1%
1.4 trieu
Phạm Hoàng Minh
Indiv
3.8%
1.3 trieu
Nguyễn Thị Hiệp
Indiv
3.1%
386.648
Ngô Hữu Hoàn
Indiv
2.8%
357.737
Nguyễn Hoàng Giang
Indiv
0.4%
48.156
Trịnh Lan Xuân
Indiv
0.3%
162.500
Lê Hữu Trung
Indiv
0.3%
40.000
Phạm Viết Đạt
Indiv
0.2%
100.500
Nguyễn Ngọc Tuấn
Indiv
0.1%
15.488
Phạm Thị Đăng Thơ
Indiv
0.1%
35.828
Board & Management
Nguyễn Quang Hòa17.3%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Trần Thị Hiền6.3%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Trịnh Lan Xuân0.3%
Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Phạm Viết Đạt0.2%
Kế toán trưởng/Giám đốc Tài chính
Trần Duy Kiều
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Minh Thư
Phó Tổng Giám đốc Kinh doanh/Người phụ trách quản trị công ty
Vương Quang Diệu
Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Hồ Văn Tuyên
Trưởng Ban Kiểm toán nội bộ /Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →