
TRV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — TRV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of 2.535 significantly exceeds the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating potential earnings manipulation. However, the company's high earnings quality score of 89.7 suggests strong cash conversion and receivables management, which mitigates some concerns.
- Beneish M-Score of 2.535 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation, exceeding the threshold of -1.78.
- SGI of 7.8050 suggests aggressive growth that may not be sustainable, raising concerns about revenue recognition practices.
- Earnings Quality Score of 89.7/100 indicates strong cash conversion and effective receivables management.
- Cash conversion metric of 100.0/100 reflects excellent operational efficiency.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with Tổng Công ty Đường sắt Việt Nam holding 87.3%, which may lead to governance risks and reduced minority shareholder influence.
Investors should conduct further due diligence on revenue recognition practices and monitor for signs of sustainability in growth. Consider a cautious approach given the elevated risk of earnings manipulation.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for TRV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate