WTC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — WTC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
WTC exhibits several concerning indicators of potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -1.8508, which is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The earnings quality score of 43.0/100, particularly low metrics in receivables and revenue, further highlight risks in financial reporting.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.8508 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 43.0/100, with 0.0/100 in receivables and revenue metrics, suggests significant issues in revenue recognition and cash flow management.
- Cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow relative to earnings, which is a positive sign amidst other red flags.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with 82.6% held by Công ty TNHH Vận Tải Việt Thuận, which may limit minority shareholder influence and increase risks of management entrenchment.
Investors should exercise caution and closely monitor WTC's financial disclosures, particularly focusing on revenue recognition practices and the implications of concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for WTC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate