LIG
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — LIG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
LIG's Beneish M-Score of -2.8005 suggests a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics indicate some weaknesses, particularly in profit margins, which could signal underlying operational challenges.
- Earnings quality margin score of 0.0/100 indicates severe issues with profitability.
- SGI of 1.1125 suggests that sales growth is outpacing earnings growth, a potential indicator of revenue recognition issues.
- High cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow generation.
- Low DSRI of 0.8689 suggests that inventory levels are well managed relative to sales.
The ownership structure shows a concentration of shares among a few individuals and institutions, which may lead to governance risks if interests diverge from minority shareholders.
Investors should closely monitor LIG's operational performance and margin improvements while considering a cautious approach due to the potential for revenue recognition issues.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for LIG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate