CTT
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CTT
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CTT demonstrates a Beneish M-Score of -2.448, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant concerns, particularly with a cash conversion score of 0.0, suggesting potential issues with cash flow management.
- Earnings Quality Score of 60.7 indicates moderate risk, particularly due to a cash conversion score of 0.0, which raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.448 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
The top shareholders include significant institutional ownership, with Tập đoàn Công nghiệp Than - Khoáng sản Việt Nam holding 41.0%, which may provide stability but also indicates potential for influence over corporate governance.
Investors should monitor cash flow closely due to the 0.0 cash conversion score and consider diversifying their holdings to mitigate risks associated with earnings quality.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CTT — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate