DIC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DIC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
DIC exhibits significant red flags indicating potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of 1.5929, which exceeds the threshold of -1.78. The company's earnings quality score of 23.8/100, particularly poor cash conversion and receivables metrics, further raises concerns about the reliability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of 1.5929 indicates likely earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 23.8/100, with cash conversion at 40.0/100 and receivables at 0.0/100, suggests poor earnings quality.
- DSRI of 10.5741 indicates a potential increase in sales, but this must be viewed cautiously given the overall context.
The ownership structure shows a concentration of shares among a few individuals and institutions, which could lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest, particularly given the high stakes in the construction and trade sectors.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence before considering investment in DIC, focusing on verifying the authenticity of earnings and assessing the impact of ownership concentration on corporate governance.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DIC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate