
BAX
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — BAX
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
BAX demonstrates a low risk of earnings manipulation according to the Beneish M-Score, which is well below the manipulation threshold. The earnings quality score is strong, particularly in cash conversion and receivables, indicating reliable financial performance.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.5952 indicates low likelihood of earnings manipulation, well below the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 83.8/100 reflects strong metrics in cash conversion (100.0/100) and receivables (100.0/100), suggesting robust operational performance.
The ownership structure is concentrated, with the top three institutional shareholders holding a combined 81.7%, which may lead to governance risks if interests diverge from minority shareholders.
Continue monitoring BAX for any changes in earnings quality metrics, but consider it a stable investment given its current strong performance indicators.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for BAX — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate