
G36
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — G36
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
G36 shows a Beneish M-Score of -2.9917, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78. However, the high SGAI of 2.1696 raises concerns about potential aggressive sales growth tactics that may not be sustainable.
- SGAI of 2.1696 suggests aggressive sales growth that may not be supported by cash flows.
- Low eq_revenue score of 44.8/100 indicates potential issues with revenue recognition.
- Earnings Quality Score of 83.3/100 indicates strong overall earnings quality.
- High eq_cash_conv and eq_receivables scores of 100.0/100 suggest effective cash conversion and receivables management.
The significant ownership by the state (18.4%) and individual shareholders may lead to governance concerns, particularly regarding transparency and alignment of interests.
Monitor G36 closely for changes in sales growth metrics and revenue recognition practices. Consider a cautious investment approach, leveraging the strong earnings quality while being wary of potential aggressive growth strategies.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for G36 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate