GLC
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — GLC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2019
GLC exhibits significant red flags indicating potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -3.752, well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The low Earnings Quality Score of 19.3/100 further highlights concerns regarding the company's financial integrity and the quality of its earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -3.752 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 19.3/100 suggests poor earnings quality, particularly with eq_receivables, eq_margin, and eq_revenue all at 0.0/100.
- DSRI of 0.2834 indicates a lower risk of inventory manipulation compared to industry norms.
- DEPI of 0.9270 suggests that the company is not aggressively recognizing revenue prematurely.
The concentrated ownership structure with top shareholders holding over 23% each raises concerns about potential governance issues and lack of independent oversight, which could exacerbate risks of financial misreporting.
Investors should exercise caution and closely monitor GLC's financial disclosures and governance practices. A thorough review of the company's financial statements and potential engagement with management may be warranted before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for GLC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate