DAG
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DAG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2023
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2022
DAG's Beneish M-Score of -2.3661 indicates a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 52.0/100, particularly low cash conversion (0.0/100), raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 52.0/100 indicates potential issues with earnings sustainability, particularly low cash conversion at 0.0/100.
- Receivables quality score of 29.0/100 suggests potential issues in collecting receivables, which could impact cash flow.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.3661 indicates a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Strong margin quality score of 100.0/100 reflects effective cost management and profitability.
The top shareholders include significant institutional ownership, which may provide stability. However, the presence of multiple individual shareholders could lead to potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor DAG's cash flow and receivables management. Consider a cautious approach until improvements in earnings quality metrics are observed.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DAG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate