
TL4
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — TL4
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
TL4 exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.7303, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 65.6/100 reveals significant weaknesses in revenue and margin quality, which could pose risks to financial stability.
- SGI at 1.3503 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
- Earnings quality metrics show 0.0/100 for both eq_margin and eq_revenue, indicating potential issues with profitability and revenue recognition.
- The cash conversion and receivables metrics are both at 100.0/100, indicating strong cash flow management and effective collection practices.
The ownership structure is concentrated, with the top five shareholders holding 76.8% of shares. This could lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest, particularly with individual shareholders holding significant stakes.
Investors should closely monitor TL4's growth strategies and earnings quality metrics. It may be prudent to adopt a cautious approach, considering the concentrated ownership and potential risks in revenue recognition.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for TL4 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate