VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Construction sector

VC2

Construction
Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư và Xây dựng VINA2
Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
4.900
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Very Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
1.838
Current
4.900
Gap
-62.5%
ModelEV EBITDA DCF BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTXây dựng và Vật liệuConstruction
Classified as construction because ICB sector "Xây dựng và Vật liệu" maps to the construction group
ModelEV/EBITDA + DCF Blend
Intrinsic = 50% x EV/EBITDA Value + 50% x DCF Value

Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.100
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
12.20%
Ke
12.20%
x
E/(D+E)
32.14%
+
Kd(1-t)
5.78%
x
D/(D+E)
67.86%
=
WACC
10.00%
2
Growth Estimate
fundamental firm blend2.29%
Growth decays 12%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
4
Valuation
50%EV/EBITDA Value
8.351
50%DCF Value
-4.674
Blended Intrinsic
1.838
Value Decomposition
35%
65%
Explicit period (35%)Terminal value (65%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VC2

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

32
Weak
Accrual Quality
76
Cash Conversion
0
Receivables
66
Margin Stability
0
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

-1.92
Moderate
DSRI
1.247
GMI
1.271
AQI
0.897
SGI
0.924
DEPI
1.137
SGAI
0.904
TATA
0.061
LVGI
1.039

VC2 displays several concerning indicators suggesting potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -1.9158, which is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. Additionally, the earnings quality score of 32.2/100, particularly low cash conversion metrics, raises significant red flags regarding the sustainability of reported earnings.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.9158 indicates potential earnings manipulation, exceeding the threshold of -1.78.
  • Earnings Quality Score of 32.2/100, with cash conversion metric at 0.0/100, suggests severe issues in converting earnings to cash.
Positive Signals
  • DSRI of 1.2469 indicates a modest increase in receivables relative to sales, which could suggest growth, albeit with caution.
  • Ownership concentration with top institutional shareholder holding 36.2% may provide stability in governance.
Ownership Risk

The significant ownership by institutional investors (36.2%) may mitigate some governance risks, but the presence of several individual shareholders could lead to potential conflicts of interest.

Recommendation

Investors should exercise caution and closely monitor VC2's financial disclosures and cash flow statements. A thorough analysis of operational performance and potential corrective actions is recommended before making investment decisions.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
2/9
Weak
Z-Score
0.80
Distress Zone
Sharpe
-0.94
Negative
Composite
14
Poor
Price Risk
Momentum
-27.1%
Volatility
33.0%
Max Drawdown
-40.7%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
24.84P/E
P/B0.46
P/S0.37
ROE1.9%
ROA0.6%
EPS225.40
BVPS12260.75
Gross Margin9.2%
Net Margin1.5%
D/E2.25
Current Ratio1.37
Rev Growth-7.5%
Profit Growth-70.4%
EV/EBITDA20.11
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
75.6M
Charter Capital
756.5B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Xây dựng
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for VC2 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Công ty Cổ phần Đầu tư MST
Inst
36.2%
27.4 trieu
Đỗ Trọng Quỳnh
Indiv
5.3%
4.0 trieu
Quỹ Đầu tư Chứng Khoán Năng động DC
Inst
4.9%
580.460
Đỗ Thị Quyên
Indiv
4.2%
633.296
Đỗ Thị Minh
Indiv
3.4%
514.570
Tạ Ngọc Phúc
Indiv
2.8%
1.9 trieu
Trần Ngọc Long
Indiv
1.1%
171.205
Nguyễn Quang Lân
Indiv
1.1%
165.692
Vũ Quý Hà
Indiv
0.6%
75.088
Lò Hồng Hiệp
Indiv
0.5%
70.572
Vũ Trọng Hùng
Indiv
0.4%
319.000
Nguyễn Đăng Gô Ganh
Indiv
0.4%
310.433
Nguyễn Quang Nguyên
Indiv
0.4%
286.000
Trịnh Văn Hưng
Indiv
0.4%
286.000
Phạm Thị Liên
Indiv
0.4%
42.121
Hoàng Việt Thanh
Indiv
0.4%
264.000
Quách Bá Vương
Indiv
0.4%
264.000
Trần Đăng Lợi
Indiv
0.2%
25.730
Trịnh Thị Hồng
Indiv
0.1%
12.173
Board & Management
Đỗ Trọng Quỳnh5.3%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Đăng Gô Ganh0.4%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Trịnh Văn Hưng0.4%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Việt Cường
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hằng
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Đỗ Trọng Huân
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Văn Chính
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Trần Xuân Trường
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Cường
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Lê Thị Tuyết Anh
Trưởng Ban kiểm soát
Đỗ Quang Việt
Giám đốc Tài chính/Phụ trách Công bố thông tin/Kế toán trưởng
Nguyễn Huy Quang
Phó Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Thanh Tuyên
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Ngô Việt Hậu
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →