
VE3
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VE3
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -1.3854 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78. However, the Earnings Quality Score of 34.9/100, particularly the cash conversion score of 0.0/100, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 34.9/100 indicates poor earnings quality, particularly with cash conversion at 0.0/100.
- SGI of 1.9136 suggests aggressive revenue growth that may not be supported by actual cash flows.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.3854 suggests a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- Receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates strong management of receivables.
The high concentration of ownership with Lê Thị Hồng Thủy holding 70.5% poses a risk of governance issues and lack of minority shareholder protection.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow metrics and consider the implications of high ownership concentration. A deeper analysis into revenue recognition practices is recommended.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VE3 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate