VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Utilities sector

VWS

Utilities
Công ty Cổ phần Nước và Môi trường Việt Nam
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt/Nước & Khí đốtCT
15.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
22.628
Current
15.000
Gap
+50.9%
ModelDDM 3STAGE

Valuation Breakdown

CTĐiện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốtUtility
Classified as utility because ICB sector "Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt" maps to the utility group
Model3-Stage DDM
Value = Sum of [DPS x (1+g)^t / (1+Ke)^t] + Terminal Dividend / (Ke - g_terminal)

The Dividend Discount Model values a stock based on its future dividend payments, discounted to present value. The 3-stage variant captures three phases of a company's life: high growth (years 1-3), a transition period where growth declines linearly (years 4-6), and a terminal stage of stable, perpetual growth (year 7+). As John D. Rockefeller said: "The only thing that gives me pleasure is to see my dividends coming in."

1
Cost of Equity (Ke)
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
0.600
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
8.70%
2
Growth Estimate
Sector Default2.00%
3
Model Inputs
DPS source:Actual dividends
DPS1.200
Payout ratio109.6%
4
Valuation
Dividends Per Share
1.200
Base Growth
2.00%
Cost of Equity
8.70%
Terminal Growth
3.50%
DDM Value
22.628
Value Decomposition
26%
74%
Explicit period (26%)Terminal value (74%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VWS

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2024

27
Poor
Accrual Quality
87
Cash Conversion
46
Receivables
4
Margin Stability
0
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2024

-2.20
Moderate
DSRI
1.344
GMI
1.123
AQI
0.884
SGI
0.823
DEPI
1.153
SGAI
1.328
TATA
0.032
LVGI
1.041

VWS exhibits several concerning financial metrics that suggest potential earnings manipulation, particularly with a Beneish M-Score of -2.2038, indicating a lower likelihood of manipulation but still warranting caution. The earnings quality score of 27.3/100, especially low scores in revenue and margin quality, raises red flags about the sustainability of reported earnings.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -2.2038, indicating potential manipulation risk despite being below the threshold.
  • Earnings Quality Score of 27.3/100, with revenue and margin quality both at 0.0/100, suggesting significant issues with revenue recognition and profitability.
Positive Signals
  • DSRI of 1.3437 indicates a reasonable level of inventory compared to sales, which could suggest effective inventory management.
Ownership Risk

The top shareholder, Tổng Công ty Tư vấn Xây dựng Việt Nam, holds a significant 35.4% stake, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest and influence over corporate governance. The concentration of ownership among a few individuals could also limit minority shareholder protections.

Recommendation

Investors should conduct further due diligence, particularly on revenue recognition practices and cash flow sustainability, before considering any position in VWS. Monitoring upcoming financial disclosures for improvements in earnings quality metrics is advisable.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
4/9
Neutral
Z-Score
1.46
Distress Zone
Sharpe
-0.44
Negative
Composite
52
Fair
Price Risk
Momentum
+30.6%
Volatility
85.3%
Max Drawdown
-38.8%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2024
11.17P/E
P/B1.66
P/S1.25
ROE16.1%
ROA7.9%
EPS2332.29
BVPS14742.46
Gross Margin11.9%
Net Margin11.9%
D/E1.08
Current Ratio1.22
Rev Growth-17.7%
Profit Growth449.9%
EV/EBITDA-52.51
Div Yield7.3%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
3.6M
Charter Capital
36.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
Industry (ICB L3)
Nước & Khí đốt
Sub-industry
Nước
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for VWS — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Tổng Công ty Tư vấn Xây dựng Việt Nam
Inst
35.4%
1.3 trieu
nguyen-nhu-ha
Indiv
7.3%
262.083
Hà Minh
Indiv
5.2%
186.800
Lê Văn Tuấn
Indiv
4.5%
162.768
nguyen-thanh-hai
Indiv
3.3%
118.142
Đỗ Thị Thúy Nga
Indiv
2.4%
86.207
Nguyễn Văn Thạnh
Indiv
2.2%
79.080
Nguyễn Hiền Hòa
Indiv
1.9%
69.565
Nguyễn Nhất Việt
Indiv
1.2%
42.981
Nguyễn Mạnh Hùng
Indiv
1.1%
38.559
Nguyễn Thành Tài
Indiv
1.0%
37.070
Đoàn Nam Anh
Indiv
0.9%
33.331
Trần Đức Toàn
Indiv
0.8%
30.000
Kiên Hùng
Indiv
0.7%
24.579
Ngô Lan Phương
Indiv
0.6%
21.942
Nguyễn Văn Nguyên
Indiv
0.6%
20.470
Phùng Ngọc Quang
Indiv
0.4%
14.570
Vũ Thị Hậu
Indiv
0.4%
13.137
Trịnh Xuân Thịnh
Indiv
0.2%
7.570
Nguyễn Thị Thủy
Indiv
0.2%
6.342
Nguyễn Văn Thắng
Indiv
0.1%
4.756
Board & Management
Lê Văn Tuấn4.5%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Thanh Hải3.3%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị/Người phụ trách quản trị công ty
Đỗ Thị Thúy Nga2.4%
Trưởng Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Văn Thành2.2%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Hiền Hòa1.9%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Mạnh Hùng1.1%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Thành Tài1.0%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Kiên Hùng0.7%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Ngô Lan Phương0.6%
Kế toán trưởng
Nguyễn Văn Nguyên0.6%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Vũ Thị Hậu0.4%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Thị Thúy0.2%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Hà Hải Tú
Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Nguyễn Bá Minh
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →