
NAC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — NAC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
NAC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.4478, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 73.8 suggests some concerns, particularly with revenue recognition, which may warrant further scrutiny.
- Earnings quality score of 0.0/100 for eq_revenue indicates potential issues with revenue recognition.
- SGI of 1.1652 suggests that sales growth is outpacing earnings growth, which can be a warning sign.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.4478 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- High cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow relative to earnings.
The top shareholders are predominantly institutional, with the largest holding 48.6%. This concentration could lead to governance risks if decisions favor major shareholders over minority interests.
Investors should monitor revenue recognition practices closely and consider a deeper analysis of cash flow trends before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for NAC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate