
CCV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CCV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
CCV exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.4956, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the SGI of 1.2666 suggests aggressive revenue growth, which may warrant further scrutiny in the context of Vietnamese market dynamics.
- SGI of 1.2666 indicates aggressive revenue growth, which may not be sustainable in the current market environment.
- Earnings Quality Score of 81.8/100 reflects strong earnings quality, particularly with an accrual score of 99.8/100 and receivables at 100.0/100.
The top shareholder, Tổng Công ty Tư vấn Xây dựng Việt Nam, holds a significant 51.0% stake, indicating potential influence over company decisions, which could pose risks related to governance and minority shareholder interests.
Investors should closely monitor revenue growth trends and assess the sustainability of earnings, while considering the strong earnings quality metrics as a positive indicator.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CCV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate