
C21
Real EstateValuation Breakdown
Real estate developers in Vietnam report land banks at historical acquisition cost (Vietnamese Accounting Standards don't allow revaluation). This means book value severely understates true asset value. This model blends two approaches: an RNAV proxy (revalued net asset value, applying a 1.5x factor to book value) weighted 40%, and a DCF on normalized cash flows weighted 60%. Highly leveraged firms receive a +2% WACC penalty.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — C21
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
C21 exhibits several concerning indicators of potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -1.9361, which is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The earnings quality score of 54.5/100, particularly low receivables and revenue metrics, further raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.9361 indicates potential earnings manipulation, exceeding the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings quality score of 54.5/100, with a particularly low receivables score of 3.1/100, suggests poor revenue collection practices.
- High accrual score of 98.2/100 indicates strong earnings management practices.
- Strong gross margin score of 100.0/100 suggests effective cost control and profitability.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with the top shareholder holding 43.5%, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest. This concentration can also impact minority shareholders' influence.
Investors should exercise caution and closely monitor C21's financial disclosures and operational performance. It may be prudent to wait for clearer signs of earnings sustainability before making significant investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for C21 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate