DTT
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DTT
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2017
DTT exhibits several concerning financial metrics that suggest potential manipulation, as indicated by its Beneish M-Score of -2.8344, which is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. Despite a decent earnings quality score of 70.0, the low revenue quality score of 0.0 raises significant concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.8344 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0 suggests severe issues with revenue recognition.
- Earnings quality score of 70.0 indicates relatively good overall earnings quality.
- Cash conversion score of 100.0 suggests strong cash flow relative to earnings.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated among a few individuals, with the top five shareholders holding a total of 79.0%. This concentration may lead to governance risks, as decisions could be influenced by a small number of stakeholders.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence before considering an investment in DTT, particularly focusing on revenue recognition practices and the implications of concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DTT — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate