
CH5
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CH5
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CH5 exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.674, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal some concerns, particularly in revenue recognition, which may warrant further scrutiny.
- Revenue quality score of 60.4/100 indicates potential issues with revenue recognition.
- SGI of 1.0466 suggests a growth rate that may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
- Earnings Quality Score of 89.3/100 reflects strong overall earnings quality.
- Cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates excellent cash flow generation relative to earnings.
The ownership structure shows significant concentration with the largest shareholder holding 36.3%, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should monitor revenue recognition practices closely and consider conducting further due diligence on the company's growth strategies, particularly in light of the elevated SGI.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CH5 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate