
CSC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CSC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CSC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.7031, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 66.4/100, particularly low scores in revenue and margin metrics, raises concerns about the sustainability of earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 66.4/100, with 0.0/100 in both eq_margin and eq_revenue, suggesting potential issues in revenue recognition and profit margins.
- SGI of 1.5019 indicates aggressive growth which may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.7031 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- High eq_cash_conv and eq_receivables scores of 100.0/100 indicate strong cash conversion and effective receivables management.
The top shareholders are primarily individuals with significant stakes, notably Đào Ngọc Thanh at 29.4%, which may lead to concentrated control and potential governance risks.
Investors should closely monitor CSC's revenue recognition practices and margin improvements while considering the concentrated ownership structure. A cautious approach is advised until clearer signals of sustainable growth and profitability emerge.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CSC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate