VHL
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VHL
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
VHL exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -3.2031, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, which is a positive signal. However, the earnings quality score of 67.2/100 reveals significant weaknesses in revenue recognition and profit margins, warranting caution.
- Earnings Quality Score of 67.2/100, particularly low revenue quality at 16.2/100, suggests potential issues in revenue recognition.
- SGAI of 1.0978 indicates higher selling, general, and administrative expenses relative to sales, which may pressure profitability.
- Beneish M-Score of -3.2031 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- Strong cash conversion score of 100.0/100 suggests effective cash management despite lower earnings quality.
The concentrated ownership structure, with 78.9% held by two institutional investors, may lead to governance risks and reduced minority shareholder influence.
Investors should monitor VHL's revenue recognition practices closely and consider engaging with management regarding the high SG&A expenses. A cautious approach is advised given the mixed signals in earnings quality.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VHL — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate