
DC4
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DC4
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.6563 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78. However, the high Sales Growth Index (SGI) of 1.5043 and the low Earnings Quality Score of 83.2 suggest potential volatility in revenue recognition and earnings sustainability.
- SGI of 1.5043 indicates aggressive revenue growth that may not be sustainable.
- Low eq_margin score of 44.2/100 raises concerns about profitability relative to revenue.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.6563 suggests a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- High eq_accrual score of 98.5/100 indicates strong accrual quality.
The ownership structure is concentrated with the top five shareholders holding over 78% of shares, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Monitor revenue growth closely, especially given the high SGI, and consider a deeper analysis of profitability metrics before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DC4 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate