
DHA
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DHA
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
DHA exhibits several concerning financial metrics, particularly its low earnings quality score of 16.5/100, indicating potential issues with revenue recognition and cash conversion. However, the Beneish M-Score of -1.1945 suggests that the likelihood of manipulation is low, as it remains above the critical threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 16.5/100, indicating significant concerns in revenue recognition and cash conversion.
- Cash conversion score of 0.0/100, highlighting severe issues in converting earnings into actual cash flow.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.1945, suggesting a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- DSRI of 0.9145, indicating that the company's inventory growth is in line with revenue growth.
The ownership structure shows a significant concentration with the largest shareholder holding 22.6%, which may lead to potential governance issues. However, the presence of institutional investors may provide some level of oversight.
Investors should closely monitor DHA's earnings quality and cash flow metrics, considering a cautious approach until improvements in cash conversion and overall earnings quality are observed.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DHA — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate