HU4
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — HU4
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -3.4866 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the high SGI of 3.1502 and low earnings quality score of 45.0/100 raise concerns about growth sustainability and earnings reliability.
- SGI of 3.1502 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
- Earnings Quality Score of 45.0/100 indicates significant issues with earnings reliability, particularly with eq_margin and eq_revenue both scoring 0.0.
- Beneish M-Score of -3.4866 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- High cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow generation relative to earnings.
The dominant ownership by Tổng Công ty Đầu tư Phát triển Nhà và Đô thị at 51.0% suggests potential for aligned interests but also raises concerns about minority shareholder influence and governance.
Investors should closely monitor the company's growth strategies and earnings quality metrics, while considering a cautious approach due to elevated risks associated with aggressive growth and low earnings reliability.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for HU4 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate