
GIC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — GIC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
GIC presents a moderate risk profile with a Beneish M-Score of -3.3758, indicating no immediate signs of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant weaknesses in receivables and revenue recognition, which could pose future risks.
- Earnings Quality Score of 59.6/100, with eq_receivables and eq_revenue both at 0.0/100, indicating potential issues in revenue recognition and collection efficiency.
- Beneish M-Score of -3.3758, well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggests a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
The high concentration of ownership, with Công ty Cổ phần Container Việt Nam holding 66.3%, poses risks related to governance and minority shareholder rights, potentially leading to decisions that favor major shareholders.
Investors should closely monitor GIC's revenue recognition practices and consider diversifying their holdings to mitigate risks associated with concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for GIC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate