
SIV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SIV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
SIV exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.5737, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, which is a positive signal. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant weaknesses in revenue recognition, suggesting potential volatility in future earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 14.6/100 for eq_revenue indicates poor revenue recognition practices, which could lead to future earnings surprises.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.5737, well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggests a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
The ownership structure is fragmented with no single shareholder holding a controlling stake, which may lead to governance challenges and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and consider a cautious approach to investment in SIV, focusing on future earnings reports for signs of improvement.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SIV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate