
IST
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — IST
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
IST exhibits a strong earnings quality score of 93.6, indicating robust cash conversion and revenue recognition practices. The Beneish M-Score of -2.7867 is well below the manipulation threshold, suggesting a low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings quality score of 93.6/100 indicates strong financial health and reliability in reported earnings.
- Cash conversion and revenue recognition metrics are perfect at 100.0/100, highlighting effective operational efficiency.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with 51% held by a single state-owned enterprise, which may pose risks related to governance and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should consider IST as a stable investment due to its strong earnings quality and low risk of manipulation, while remaining vigilant about the implications of concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for IST — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate