VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Cyclicals sector

SRF

Cyclicals
Công ty Cổ phần Searefico
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp/Công nghiệp nặngCT
7.190
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Very Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
4.852
Current
7.190
Gap
-32.5%
ModelEV EBITDA MIDCYCLE

Valuation Breakdown

CTHàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệpCyclical
Classified as cyclical because ICB sector "Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp" maps to the cyclical group
ModelEV/EBITDA Mid-Cycle
Equity Value = Mid-Cycle EBITDA x Fair EV/EBITDA - Net Debt

Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.

1
Model Inputs
Mid-Cycle EBITDA56.10B
Fair EV/EBITDA12.2x
Years of data7
2
Valuation
Mid-Cycle EBITDA
56.10B
x
Fair EV/EBITDA
12.2x
-
Net Debt
509.25B
=
Equity Value
4.852
Years of data7

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SRF

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

37
Weak
Accrual Quality
57
Cash Conversion
0
Receivables
100
Margin Stability
0
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

-1.09
High Risk
DSRI
0.932
GMI
2.060
AQI
2.104
SGI
1.136
DEPI
0.774
SGAI
1.954
TATA
0.112
LVGI
1.021

The Beneish M-Score of -1.0872 indicates that SRF is not likely to be manipulating earnings, as it is well above the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 37.0/100, particularly low cash conversion and revenue metrics, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.

Red Flags
  • Earnings Quality Score of 37.0/100 indicates significant issues with cash conversion (0.0/100) and revenue recognition (0.0/100), suggesting potential earnings manipulation or aggressive accounting practices.
  • The GMI of 2.0599 suggests that gross margins are deteriorating, which could indicate operational challenges or pricing pressures.
Positive Signals
  • The DSRI of 0.9325 indicates that accounts receivable are growing at a slower rate than sales, which is a positive sign for cash flow management.
  • Top institutional shareholders hold a significant portion (58.0%) of the company, which may provide stability and oversight.
Ownership Risk

The ownership structure is heavily concentrated among a few institutional investors, which can lead to potential conflicts of interest and reduced shareholder activism. However, this concentration can also provide stability.

Recommendation

Investors should closely monitor SRF's earnings quality metrics and operational performance, particularly cash conversion and revenue recognition. Consider a cautious approach, potentially waiting for improved earnings quality before making significant investments.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
3/9
Weak
Z-Score
0.88
Distress Zone
Sharpe
-1.13
Negative
Composite
22
Poor
Price Risk
Momentum
-20.2%
Volatility
34.8%
Max Drawdown
-30.5%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
16.14P/E
P/B0.76
P/S0.23
ROE4.9%
ROA1.0%
EPS495.78
BVPS10575.41
Gross Margin3.2%
Net Margin1.4%
D/E2.89
Current Ratio1.00
Rev Growth13.6%
Profit Growth909.8%
EV/EBITDA-11.35
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
35.6M
Charter Capital
355.7B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp
Industry (ICB L3)
Công nghiệp nặng
Sub-industry
Máy công nghiệp
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for SRF — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Công ty Cổ Phần Taisei Oncho
Inst
25.1%
8.9 trieu
Công ty TNHH Kỹ Thuật Và Xây Dựng Sanyo Việt Nam
Inst
20.1%
7.2 trieu
Tổng Công ty Thủy sản Việt Nam
Inst
12.8%
4.6 trieu
nguyen-thi-hong
Indiv
4.5%
1.6 trieu
nguyen-thanh-son
Indiv
4.1%
1.3 trieu
Lê Tấn Phước
Indiv
2.6%
858.908
Ngô Thị Mai
Indiv
1.8%
618.090
Võ Khắc Đức
Indiv
1.3%
420.786
Hồ Thị Hoàng Diệu
Indiv
1.0%
248.860
Nguyễn Quang Chơn
Indiv
0.9%
218.863
Công ty Cổ phần Dịch vụ tổng hợp Sài Gòn
Inst
0.7%
173.000
Hà Hạnh Hoa
Indiv
0.5%
196.471
Trần Đình Mười
Indiv
0.4%
160.001
Công ty Cổ phần Sữa Việt Nam
Inst
0.4%
102.100
Viên Quang Mùi
Indiv
0.2%
55.419
Mai Chánh Thành
Indiv
0.2%
53.769
Nguyễn Quốc Cường
Indiv
0.2%
70.528
Phạm Ngọc Sơn
Indiv
0.1%
48.722
Trần Mỹ Kim
Indiv
0.1%
50.000
Board & Management
Lê Tấn Phước2.6%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Trần Đình Mười0.4%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Quốc Cường0.2%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Phạm Ngọc Sơn0.1%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hường
Tổng Giám đốc/Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Nguyễn Hữu Thịnh
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Vương Trần Quốc Thanh
Kế toán trưởng
Nishi Masayuki
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Đỗ Thị Thanh Thảo
Người phụ trách quản trị công ty
Ryota Fukuda
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Lê Quang Phúc
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị độc lập
Phan Thành Long
Giám đốc Tài chính
Lee Men Leng
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →