QBS
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — QBS
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
QBS exhibits significant financial manipulation risk as indicated by a Beneish M-Score of 259.5286, far exceeding the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The low earnings quality score of 5.0/100 further underscores concerns regarding the reliability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of 259.5286 indicates high likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 5.0/100 suggests severe issues with earnings reliability.
- DSRI of 338.3162 indicates potential aggressive revenue recognition practices.
- The GMI of 0.0042 is relatively low, which may indicate less risk of gross margin deterioration.
- DEPI of 1.2742 suggests that the company is investing in growth, which could be a positive sign if managed properly.
The top shareholder, Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hương, holds 13.3%, indicating a concentrated ownership structure that may lead to governance risks. The lack of institutional ownership beyond 3.5% raises concerns about oversight.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence before considering an investment in QBS, focusing on verifying the integrity of financial statements and assessing management practices.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for QBS — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate