
SFI
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SFI
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
SFI exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -1.9118, indicating potential earnings manipulation concerns as it falls below the threshold of -1.78. The earnings quality score of 41.7 suggests weaknesses in cash conversion and revenue recognition, which could pose risks to financial stability.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.9118 indicates potential earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 41.7/100, with a cash conversion score of 0.0/100, suggests significant issues in cash flow management.
- DSRI of 0.8940 indicates that inventory levels are well managed relative to sales.
- Receivables quality score of 78.9/100 shows strong management of accounts receivable.
The top shareholder, Công ty Cổ phần Đầu Tư Nmvt, holds a substantial 50.7% stake, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest given the concentration of ownership.
Investors should closely monitor SFI's financial disclosures and consider conducting further due diligence on cash flow management practices before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SFI — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate