LTC
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — LTC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2023
LTC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.7583, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 69.7/100 reveals significant weaknesses in revenue and margin quality, which could pose risks to future performance.
- Earnings quality metrics show 0.0/100 for both eq_margin and eq_revenue, indicating potential concerns about revenue recognition and profitability.
- The Beneish M-Score of -2.7583 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
The top shareholders include a significant institutional investor (15.3%), which may provide stability, but the high concentration of individual shareholders (totaling 34.3%) could lead to governance challenges.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and margin improvements, while considering the stability provided by institutional ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for LTC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate