CKV
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CKV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2020
CKV shows a Beneish M-Score of -3.3265, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 64.3/100 reveals mixed signals, particularly with low margins and revenue quality, which could raise concerns about sustainable profitability.
- Earnings quality margin score is 0.0/100, indicating potential issues with profitability sustainability.
- The SGI of 1.1058 suggests that sales growth may be outpacing the overall market demand, which could indicate aggressive revenue recognition.
- The cash conversion score is 100.0/100, indicating strong cash flow generation relative to earnings.
- The low DSRI of 0.5931 suggests that accounts receivable are well managed, reducing the risk of revenue manipulation.
The top shareholder, Tập Đoàn Bưu Chính Viễn Thông Việt Nam, holds a significant 49.0% stake, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest and governance risks, particularly in decision-making processes.
Investors should closely monitor CKV's earnings quality metrics and consider the implications of its ownership structure. A cautious approach is advised, focusing on cash flow performance and operational efficiency.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CKV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate