VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Technology sector

KST

Technology
Công ty Cổ phần KASATI
Công nghệ Thông tin/Thiết bị và Phần cứngCT
13.500
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Undervalued
Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
77.971
Current
13.500
Gap
+477.6%
ModelDCF PE BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTCông nghệ Thông tinTechnology
Classified as technology because ICB sector "Công nghệ Thông tin" maps to the technology group
ModelDCF + P/E Blend
Intrinsic = 60% x DCF Value + 40% x (Fair P/E x EPS)

Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.300
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
13.60%
Ke
13.60%
x
E/(D+E)
28.55%
+
Kd(1-t)
6.34%
x
D/(D+E)
71.45%
=
WACC
10.00%
2
Growth Estimate
fundamental firm blend5.84%
Growth decays 5%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
Max fair P/E11.69x
4
Valuation
60%DCF Value
118.688
40%P/E Value
16.895
Blended Intrinsic
77.971
Value Decomposition
40%
60%
Explicit period (40%)Terminal value (60%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — KST

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

64
Fair
Accrual Quality
50
Cash Conversion
100
Receivables
100
Margin Stability
47
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

-2.56
Low Risk
DSRI
1.107
GMI
1.202
AQI
0.607
SGI
1.560
DEPI
1.367
SGAI
0.721
TATA
-0.139
LVGI
1.202

KST exhibits several concerning indicators of potential financial manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -2.5619, significantly below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. While the earnings quality score of 64.4/100 suggests some stability, the high SGI of 1.5599 and low revenue quality score of 0.0/100 raise significant red flags regarding growth sustainability and revenue recognition practices.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -2.5619 indicates potential earnings manipulation, well below the threshold of -1.78.
  • SGI of 1.5599 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
  • Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 indicates severe issues in revenue recognition, raising concerns about the reliability of reported earnings.
Positive Signals
  • Earnings quality cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow relative to earnings.
  • Ownership by institutions (55.2% combined) suggests a level of stability and oversight in governance.
Ownership Risk

The significant institutional ownership (55.2%) could provide some level of governance and oversight, mitigating risks associated with individual shareholders. However, the concentration of ownership in a few entities may lead to conflicts of interest.

Recommendation

Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence, particularly regarding revenue recognition practices and growth sustainability. Monitoring future earnings reports and cash flow statements will be crucial to assess the reliability of KST's financial health.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
3/9
Weak
Z-Score
2.54
Grey Zone
Sharpe
0.15
Positive
Composite
76
Strong
Price Risk
Momentum
+18.5%
Volatility
65.8%
Max Drawdown
-25.4%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
6.56P/E
P/B0.91
P/S0.11
ROE14.3%
ROA4.0%
EPS1904.87
BVPS13665.14
Gross Margin5.8%
Net Margin1.6%
D/E3.39
Current Ratio1.26
Rev Growth56.4%
Profit Growth10.4%
EV/EBITDA-0.15
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
6.0M
Charter Capital
59.9B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Công nghệ Thông tin
Industry (ICB L3)
Thiết bị và Phần cứng
Sub-industry
Thiết bị viễn thông
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for KST — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Tập Đoàn Bưu Chính Viễn Thông Việt Nam
Inst
33.9%
2.0 trieu
Tổng Công ty Cổ phần Bảo hiểm Bưu điện
Inst
21.3%
1.3 trieu
Lê Phước Hiền
Indiv
3.6%
214.240
Trần Minh Dũng
Indiv
1.1%
32.000
Lương Ngọc Hương
Indiv
1.0%
30.000
Võ Ngọc Anh
Indiv
1.0%
59.710
Nguyễn Thị Kim Hoa
Indiv
0.7%
20.400
Phan Văn Nghĩa
Indiv
0.6%
18.000
Võ Hồng Lạc
Indiv
0.5%
14.700
Trần Ngọc Tuân
Indiv
0.5%
14.400
Lê Minh Trí
Indiv
0.4%
12.435
nguyen-long
Indiv
0.4%
23.480
Hoàng Thị Thanh Trúc
Indiv
0.3%
8.000
Vũ Trọng Hiếu
Indiv
0.2%
6.900
Đỗ Quang Khánh
Indiv
0.2%
11.600
Đoàn Thị Triệu Phước
Indiv
0.1%
6.068
Board & Management
Lê Phước Hiền3.6%
Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Võ Ngọc Anh1.0%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Long0.4%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Đỗ Quang Khánh0.2%
Phó Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Đoàn Thị Triệu Phước0.1%
Kế toán trưởng
Tô Hoài Văn
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Hồ Thị Kim Oanh
Trưởng Ban kiểm soát
Đỗ Ngọc Khánh
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Trần Quang Minh Mẫn
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Thị Hồng Mai
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →