VTC
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VTC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
VTC exhibits significant red flags indicating potential earnings manipulation, with a Beneish M-Score of 0.4067, well above the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The earnings quality score of 26.9/100 further highlights concerns regarding revenue recognition and cash conversion.
- Beneish M-Score of 0.4067 indicates potential earnings manipulation, significantly above the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 26.9/100, with eq_cash_conv at 0.0/100, suggests severe issues in cash flow relative to reported earnings.
- SGI of 2.2101 indicates aggressive growth that may not be sustainable, raising concerns about revenue recognition practices.
- Receivables quality score at 100.0/100 suggests strong management of accounts receivable, indicating potential reliability in cash flow from collections.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with Tập Đoàn Bưu Chính Viễn Thông Việt Nam holding 46.7%, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should exercise caution and consider conducting further due diligence on VTC's financial practices and governance before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VTC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate