VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Construction sector

MBG

Construction
Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn MBG
Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
2.900
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
924
Current
2.900
Gap
-68.1%
ModelEV EBITDA DCF BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTXây dựng và Vật liệuConstruction
Classified as construction because ICB sector "Xây dựng và Vật liệu" maps to the construction group
ModelEV/EBITDA + DCF Blend
Intrinsic = 50% x EV/EBITDA Value + 50% x DCF Value

Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.100
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
12.20%
Ke
12.20%
x
E/(D+E)
93.51%
+
Kd(1-t)
7.59%
x
D/(D+E)
6.49%
=
WACC
11.90%
2
Growth Estimate
fundamental firm blend3.00%
Growth decays 12%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
4
Valuation
50%EV/EBITDA Value
2.281
50%DCF Value
-433
Blended Intrinsic
924
Value Decomposition
42%
58%
Explicit period (42%)Terminal value (58%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — MBG

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

49
Weak
Accrual Quality
96
Cash Conversion
19
Receivables
100
Margin Stability
0
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2024

-3.66
Low Risk
DSRI
1.188
GMI
-0.412
AQI
1.184
SGI
0.612
DEPI
0.964
SGAI
0.667
TATA
-0.028
LVGI
1.795

MBG exhibits several concerning indicators suggesting potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -3.6612, which is significantly below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. Additionally, the earnings quality metrics reveal weaknesses in revenue recognition and receivables management, posing risks to the reliability of reported earnings.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -3.6612 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation, well below the threshold of -1.78.
  • Earnings Quality Score of 50.4 suggests moderate quality, with particularly low scores in revenue (21.2/100) and receivables (0.0/100), indicating potential issues in revenue recognition.
Positive Signals
  • The accrual component of earnings quality is strong at 88.9/100, indicating that reported earnings are backed by actual cash flows.
  • The company has a relatively low SGI of 0.6120, suggesting that growth is not being pursued aggressively, which may help maintain stability.
Ownership Risk

The ownership structure is concentrated among a few individuals, with the top three shareholders holding a combined 26.3%. This concentration can lead to governance risks, as decisions may favor the interests of a small group over minority shareholders.

Recommendation

Investors should approach MBG with caution due to the elevated risk of earnings manipulation. A thorough review of financial statements and monitoring of future earnings reports is recommended before making investment decisions.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
4/9
Neutral
Z-Score
2.78
Grey Zone
Sharpe
-0.48
Negative
Composite
25
Poor
Price Risk
Momentum
-13.5%
Volatility
43.2%
Max Drawdown
-34.8%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
17.83P/E
P/B0.28
P/S0.69
ROE1.6%
ROA1.4%
EPS168.29
BVPS10874.04
Gross Margin6.5%
Net Margin3.8%
D/E0.11
Current Ratio7.01
Rev Growth68.9%
Profit Growth-26.1%
EV/EBITDA12.20
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
120.2M
Charter Capital
1202.2B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Vật liệu xây dựng & Nội thất
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for MBG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Phạm Huy Thành
Indiv
9.6%
11.5 trieu
Đặng Thị Tuyết Lan
Indiv
9.3%
11.2 trieu
Vũ Quang Doanh
Indiv
7.4%
595.000
Công ty TNHH Quang Ngân Việt Nam
Inst
5.5%
4.0 trieu
Công ty TNHH AAI Quốc tế
Inst
5.5%
4.0 trieu
Trần Thị Hiền
Indiv
5.1%
3.5 trieu
Trần Minh Tuấn
Indiv
5.1%
3.5 trieu
Nguyễn Chiến Toàn
Indiv
5.1%
404.900
Peter Eric Dennis
Indiv
4.2%
880.000
Ngô Thị Huệ
Indiv
1.7%
743.302
Đặng Nhật Anh
Indiv
1.5%
123.100
Board & Management
Phạm Huy Thành9.6%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Đặng Thị Tuyết Lan9.3%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Phó Tổng Giám đốc/Người phụ trách quản trị công ty/Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Dương Quang Đông
Phó Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Vương Bảo Yến
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Phạm Tuyết Nhung
Trưởng Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Thị Mai
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Thị Hạnh
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Thị Bích
Kế toán trưởng
Trần Thúy Loan
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →