
VMK
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VMK
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
VMK's Beneish M-Score of -0.9594 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78. However, the high DSRI of 2.9315 and low AQI of 0.9889 raise concerns about the sustainability of revenue and earnings quality.
- DSRI of 2.9315 indicates significant growth in receivables relative to sales, suggesting potential revenue recognition issues.
- AQI of 0.9889 is below the ideal threshold of 1.0, indicating potential issues with earnings quality.
- Earnings Quality Score of 64.7/100 suggests a moderate level of earnings quality, with strong cash conversion at 100.0/100.
- GMI of 0.9217 indicates a stable gross margin, which is a positive sign for profitability.
The ownership structure is concentrated, with 25.8% held by an institutional investor, which may provide some stability. However, the lack of significant individual shareholder stakes raises concerns about governance and accountability.
Monitor VMK closely for changes in receivables and earnings quality metrics. Consider a cautious investment approach, focusing on quarterly earnings reports for signs of improving or declining financial health.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VMK — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate