PCC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PCC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
PCC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.3906, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it falls below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the SGI of 1.3154 suggests aggressive growth that may not be sustainable, warranting caution.
- SGI of 1.3154 indicates aggressive growth which could lead to future earnings pressure.
- GMI of 1.2139 suggests increasing gross margin pressures, which may indicate rising costs or pricing power issues.
- Earnings Quality Score of 89.1/100 indicates strong overall earnings quality, particularly with a cash conversion score of 100.0/100.
- Low DSRI of 0.9672 suggests that accounts receivable are well-managed relative to sales.
The ownership structure is relatively concentrated, with the largest shareholder holding 30%. This concentration could lead to governance risks if interests diverge from minority shareholders.
Monitor the company's growth closely, particularly the sustainability of its aggressive SGI. Consider a cautious approach to investment until further clarity on long-term growth strategies is provided.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PCC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate