PVY
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
PVY exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.9206, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 61.1 suggests moderate concerns, particularly with revenue and margin metrics scoring 0.0, which could indicate issues with revenue recognition or profitability.
- Earnings quality metrics show 0.0 for eq_margin and eq_revenue, indicating potential issues with profitability and revenue recognition.
- SGI at 1.2132 suggests aggressive growth that may not be sustainable, raising concerns about future performance.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.9206 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation, which is a positive signal for investors.
- High cash conversion score of 100.0 indicates strong ability to convert sales into cash, suggesting operational efficiency.
The top shareholders are predominantly institutional, with the largest holding at 28.7%, which may provide stability but also raises concerns about potential influence on management decisions and strategic direction.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and margin improvements while considering the strong cash conversion metrics as a positive sign. A cautious approach is recommended given the elevated risk level.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PVY — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate