
S99
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — S99
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
S99 exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -3.3838, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 62.9/100, particularly low scores in margin and revenue metrics, suggest potential concerns regarding the sustainability of earnings.
- Earnings quality score of 29.7/100 in margin indicates significant concerns about profitability.
- Revenue quality score of 5.4/100 raises alarms about the reliability of reported revenue figures.
- Beneish M-Score of -3.3838 suggests a low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash generation relative to earnings.
The ownership structure is concentrated with the top shareholder holding 21.8%, which could lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest. The presence of multiple individual shareholders may also indicate a lack of institutional oversight.
Investors should closely monitor earnings quality metrics, particularly margins and revenue, while considering the implications of concentrated ownership. A cautious approach is advised until improvements in earnings sustainability are observed.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for S99 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate