
XLV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — XLV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -0.5679 indicates that XLV is not likely to be manipulating earnings, as it is well above the threshold of -1.78. However, the high Sales Growth Index (SGI) of 3.1200 raises concerns about sustainability, suggesting potential overestimation of future revenues.
- SGI of 3.1200 indicates aggressive revenue growth expectations, which may not be sustainable in the current market context.
- Earnings Quality Score of 81.4/100, with high scores in cash conversion (100.0/100) and receivables (100.0/100), indicating strong operational efficiency.
The concentrated ownership structure, with the top five shareholders holding a combined 55.2%, may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest, particularly in decision-making processes.
Investors should monitor revenue growth closely due to the elevated SGI and consider diversifying their portfolio to mitigate risks associated with concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for XLV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate