
AGG
Real EstateValuation Breakdown
Real estate developers in Vietnam report land banks at historical acquisition cost (Vietnamese Accounting Standards don't allow revaluation). This means book value severely understates true asset value. This model blends two approaches: an RNAV proxy (revalued net asset value, applying a 1.5x factor to book value) weighted 40%, and a DCF on normalized cash flows weighted 60%. Highly leveraged firms receive a +2% WACC penalty.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — AGG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
AGG exhibits several concerning indicators of potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -1.8735, which is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. Additionally, the earnings quality score of 28.9/100 reflects significant weaknesses in cash conversion and receivables management, raising further red flags.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.8735 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 28.9/100, with eq_cash_conv and eq_receivables both at 0.0/100, suggests severe issues in cash flow and receivables management.
- Strong revenue recognition with eq_revenue at 98.8/100 indicates that revenue is being recognized appropriately.
The ownership structure is concentrated, with Nguyễn Bá Sáng holding 26.2%, which could lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest, especially in decision-making processes.
Investors should approach AGG with caution, closely monitoring future earnings reports and cash flow metrics. Consider diversifying investments to mitigate risks associated with potential earnings manipulation.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for AGG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate