
CDO
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CDO
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.4084 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 44.4/100, particularly with a cash conversion score of 0.0/100, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 44.4/100, with a cash conversion score of 0.0/100 indicating poor cash flow relative to earnings.
- High DSRI of 1.1269 suggests potential issues with inventory management or sales recognition.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.4084 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Strong receivables score of 100.0/100 indicates effective management of accounts receivable.
The ownership structure is fragmented with no single shareholder holding a significant stake, which may lead to potential governance issues and lack of accountability.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow performance and consider the implications of the low earnings quality score before making investment decisions. It may be prudent to wait for improved cash conversion metrics or clearer visibility on revenue recognition practices.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CDO — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate